Post by PWSo what is wrong Andrew with another LOMAC?
The graphics engine has been tweaked an polished, but it's still so very, very
LOMAC, with many weaknesses. And although they keep fiddling with the mission
structure, I never get motivated to fly their missions and campaigns. They are
technical puzzles to be solved rather than involving.
I've said before that EECH got close to providing a scenario I really cared about.
You provide air support for a genuine ground war. F4 had that as well, but it was
on too grand a scale for me to feel like an important part of the war machine.
I want to fly missions softening up ground forces, then patrolling the skies while
ground forces move up and consolidate. The Crimea map was perfect for this with so
many air bases to use as staging posts. You start on the Kuznetsov, helping a
seaborne landing to take over one airbase, establish a bridgehead, then chose which
direction your ground forces head off in while you do the showy-offy aerial stuff
with your wingies.
And so on. :-)
Andrew McP